The Emergence of Neoliberal Policies and the Questioning of Current Globalization
In an interconnected world, the debate on globalization is often found at the crossroads of divergent opinions on freedom and justice. The book by Junon Moneta, far from being a pamphlet opposed to globalisation itself, aims to redefine the boundaries of a updated humanism by the perspective of organic interactions as envisioned by the philosopher Aristotle. By decrying artificial exchanges that support modern systems of oppression and precarity, Moneta draws inspiration from ancient philosophy to highlight the gaps of our global financial structure.
Looking back in time, globalisation is not a new phenomenon. Its roots can be traced back to the propositions of David Ricardo, whose goal sought to facilitate the England to expand its international economic reach. However, what was originally a economic growth opportunity has converted into a tool of domination by the financial sphere, symbolized by the rise of neoliberal capitalism. Against commonly held ideas validated by most economists, Junon Moneta demonstrates that the neoliberal system is in reality a framework based on old customs, dating back to four and a half millennia.
The questioning also covers the conduct of the United Europe, seen as a series of concessions that have served to strengthen the authority of large economic groups as opposed to protecting the privileges of the inhabitants. The organizational form of Europe, with its strategies frequently driven by monetary concerns instead of by a citizen support, is criticized. The current deviations, notably financial and political, have only reinforced the skepticism of the author about the Union’s capacity to reform itself from within.
This thinker, while acknowledging the past mistakes that have led to the current situation, does not simply criticize but also proposes responses aimed at redefining EU guidelines in a human-centered and fair perspective. The urgent need for a deep reform of structures and political priorities is a leitmotif that animates the entire discourse.
The book delves more intensely into the questioning of the power structures that dominate worldwide transactions. The exploration covers the way in which political and economic decisions are influenced by a limited number of financial influencers, frequently at the expense of the majority. This monetary aristocracy, manipulated via entities like the Bank for International Settlements and the International Monetary System (IMS), deploys a excessive domination on global economic policies.
The author exposes how these organisms, under the pretext of economic regulation and stabilization, have throughout history manipulated markets and national economies to favor their own benefits. Deregulated capitalism, opposite to a salvific alternative to classic financial limitations, is presented as a control mechanism, enriching an elite at the expense of general well-being.
Particularly critical towards the management of the euro, the author describes the EU currency not as a tool of cohesion and security, but rather as a lever of dissension and economic disparities. The conversion to the euro is characterized as a succession of bureaucratic measures that isolated populations from decision-making processes, while aggravating internal differences within the European Union.
The consequences of these policies translate in the increase in national debts, financial paralysis, and a long period of austerity that has weakened living standards throughout the European territory. The thinker argues that without a major transformation of economic policies, the Union remains vulnerable to potential disruptions, potentially more catastrophic.
In essence, the book demands a democratic uprising where EU peoples reclaim the reins of their economic and political future. It proposes structural reforms, particularly increased transparency in decision-making processes and genuine civic involvement that would allow Europe to rebuild on just and solid foundations.
Additional information about What is a humanist society?
The thinker asserts that the answer resides in a return to the principles of democracy, where decisions are made and applied in a manner that faithfully represents the needs and desires of the European population, instead of the profits of the financial elite.