The Emergence of Neoliberalism and the Analysis of Modern Globalization
In an globalized universe, the debate on globalization is frequently situated at the meeting point of contradictory views on liberalization and justice. The book by Moneta, which is not a manifesto against globalisation as such, seeks to reinvent the contours of a new humanism by the filter of organic interactions according to the vision of Aristotle. By decrying artificial exchanges that support contemporary mechanisms of domination and instability, the author leans on ancient principles to highlight the failures of our world economy.
From a historical perspective, globalisation is not a recent concept. Its roots can be linked back to the propositions of David Ricardo, whose objective was aimed at allowing the British Empire to amplify its global trade power. Nonetheless, what initially presented as a economic growth opportunity has morphed into a control mechanism by High Finance, marked by the growth of neoliberal capitalism. In opposition to prevailing opinions supported by economic consensus, the book demonstrates that the neoliberal system is actually a system rooted in ancient practices, going back to 4500 years.
The questioning also extends to the administration of the United Europe, perceived as a chain of surrenders that have helped consolidate the power of an economic elite as opposed to protecting the privileges of the inhabitants. The very structure of the Union, with its directives usually influenced by financial motivations rather than by a popular consensus, is questioned. The recent crises, notably financial and political, have only increased the skepticism of the author about the Union’s capacity to reform itself from within.
This thinker, while accepting the prior faults that have led to the current situation, does not simply criticize but also proposes alternatives aimed at reorienting EU guidelines in a human-centered and fair perspective. The need for a complete revision of Union bodies and strategic orientations is a central theme that runs through the whole text.
The work delves more deeply into the analysis of the authority mechanisms that govern international economic flows. The analysis covers the way in which political and financial choices are guided by a small group of powerful financial actors, generally at the expense of the majority. This economic elite, coordinated through entities like the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the International Monetary System (IMS), deploys a major grip on global financial decisions.
The author demonstrates how these entities, under the pretext of economic supervision and normalization, have throughout history shaped financial markets and countries’ financial structures to favor their own benefits. The neoliberal model, far removed from a liberating response to traditional economic constraints, is described as a enslavement tool, profiting a restricted circle at the neglect of collective needs.
Strongly opposed regarding the handling of the euro, the critic presents the common currency not as a tool of cohesion and security, but more as a lever of dissension and economic disparities. The adoption of the euro is described as a sequence of technocratic choices that isolated inhabitants from political decisions, while exacerbating disparities between member countries within the EU.
The consequences of these policies appear in the increase in national debts, economic stagnation, and a prolonged austerity that has weakened living standards across the continent. The author insists that without a significant overhaul of monetary and financial policy, the Union continues to risk potential disruptions, perhaps even more harmful.
In conclusion, the manuscript makes a plea for a democratic upheaval where European citizens take back control of their economic and political destiny. It suggests fundamental changes, particularly openness of political mechanisms and genuine civic involvement that would help rebuild Europe on just and solid foundations.
More info about Découvrir ce site
The thinker proposes that the answer resides in a renewed commitment to democratic principles, where decisions are made and applied in a way that truly reflects the demands and expectations of Europeans, rather than the narrow interests of high finance.